This marks the start of a prolonged series on the Gospel of Luke. As we’ve already examined the book of Acts, it seems reasonable that the first Gospel we study should be Luke as both share a common author. Ask anyone to compare the gospels and two facts will almost always be mentioned: (1) that John is the Gospel of Love, and (2) that Luke is the Historical Gospel. While it is true that John gives us a look into Jesus’ personal struggles and relates stories not contained in any other gospel account, it is not true that Luke is purely a historical account.
Charis Christian Center is a church and ministry located in Colorado Springs, Colorado. For years they have paid the city’s Mountain Metro Transit (MMT), the city-run bus system around town, thousands to advertise on bus benches. Their first campaigns boldly proclaimed in large letters “Celebrate Jesus” and “Experience Jesus”, and its current ad states “Jesus is Lord.” But this encouraging tribute to our Lord may be ending on July 10, 2016 as the Metro City Transit has ordered the ministry to remove Jesus from their advertising message. Reportedly the authority has received only a single complaint about the signs.
Given the analogy that Jesus uses, that he is the vine, his Father is the gardener, and we are the branches, it seems clear that the mystery of “remaining in” means to keep connected to God. This is something we have talked about frequently at Think-Biblically.com, building connections with God. In this case, however, we can discern a very specific way to build a connection, perseverance. “Remaining in” implies connection, but simply “remaining” involves persevering. Therefore, we are to persevere in our relationship with God to abide in him.
At the church I grew up in was a member who always came dressed in the most outrageous outfits. Her socks never matched, and her clothing was always a strange mish-mash. When asked about her obviously poor ability to dress herself she replied that she always asked God what to wear, and she wore whatever he picked out. Mostly the other congregants laughed off her behavior; I cannot recall a single time anyone explored further the theology that drove her to such extreme fashions. Possibly because everyone wishes that God was that active in their lives and are a little disappointed that he isn’t.
In the early centuries following Jesus there were secret societies called Mystery Religions. Like something out of a Dan Brown novel, they met in ancient temples and their initiation rites and path to renewal were closely guarded secrets. Their beliefs were often centered on the cycle of the seasons, or of life itself woven into the fabric of myth of gods or goddesses that lead to a mystical experience centering on the emotional satisfaction of its members. What many don’t know is that Jesus too had a secret, knowledge that only his closest followers were privy to.
Last week I happened upon a church in my neighborhood and looked upon their statement of faith. At first everything seemed in keeping with sound theology, until near the end when I found this statement: “Baptism saves! Contrary to popular belief, baptism is part of salvation.” Once I was over my initial shock that anyone would want to add anything to the gospel I asked a simple question, “which baptism?” The answer I received was not surprising, but it may be enlightening for some to explain why I asked the question. There are, in fact, seven different baptisms mentioned in the Bible.
Since “holy” is usually defined as separate or set apart one would be forgiven for thinking that we must withdraw from the world to become holy. During the middle ages monks would go to extreme measures to do exactly that, moving to monasteries far removed from civilization and even forgoing talking to one another in some such retreats. On one occasion a humble monk joined just such a monastery and was told he could only speak two words one every three years. At the end of the first three years he went before the Cardinal and said, “bad food.” Three years later he returned and spoke to the Cardinal, “bad bed”.
Mourning creates conditions where the presence of God can enter in fullness and comfort and bless and heal the mourner. This is only the first reversal we see in the Sermon on the Mount. Here mourners find comfort in the knowledge that God cares for them and invites them into his healing presence. These are words every victim in Orlando need to experience. More than that, however, Christians ought to be such a blessing to mourners in their expression of the love and grace of God that they have received.
“Ishrat no more. My friend Ishrat was brutally tortured and killed by terrorists in a Dhaka restaurant yesterday… Most of the Muslim Bangladeshis were spared after they identified themselves and recited limes from the Koran. Ishrat, who was not wearing a Hijab and neither wanted to prove herself, was hacked to death with a machete. Twenty other foreign hostages were also hacked to death with sharp weapons by Islamist terrorists during a dramatic siege at an upmarket Dhaka restaurant that ended in a bloodbath… The majority of the victims were from Italy and Japan.” – Aloke Kumar, July 2, 2016
If you are a Christian who has taken the time to read the Bible and do at least a little digging into theology, then you probably love to debate. One of the most often debated topics in Bible schools across the globe is that of Calvinism vs. Arminianism, or more specifically a subset of those two theologies around the notion of Eternal Security. For some, once you have placed your trust in Jesus your eternal fate is sealed, and for others it is merely a decision that can be reversed later. There are problems on both sides of the debate.
The distinction between judicial holiness and positional holiness is an important one. Judicial holiness means we have never broken any part of God’s law and that we have the same holiness as God himself. Since “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Romans 3.23) our holiness, if we have any at all, is at the very least tarnished. We are guilty of breaking God’s law and, therefore, can never be judicially holy.
Not long ago a friend of mine posted on Facebook two contrasting cases of injustice. The first is the case of Lee Carol Brooker. At 75 years old, this veteran is serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole for growing 34 marijuana plants in his back yard. Certainly this is more than a person would need to grow for “personal use” though there was no indication that he was dealing the drug. Conversely, in an age where 25 states have either passed legalization laws, or are about to, the sentence seems harsh.